Sunday 27 December 2009

News article: 100 people a week treated for dog bites as attacks soar 66%

More than 100 victims of dog bites are admitted to hospital each week, a rise of 66 per cent in a decade.
Latest figures show that 5,221 people were treated during 2008-09 after dog attacks in England - up from 3,137 ten years earlier. 

The total includes 1,250 children, including many babies and toddlers. 


muzzle the devil dogs
However, as the data does not include victims seen in A&E who are not admitted, the true figure will be much higher. 

The NHS statistics were revealed only two weeks after four-year-old John-Paul Massey was savaged to death by an illegal pit-bull terrier and amid growing concern that some breeds are being bought not as pets, but as 'badges of honour'.

Other figures show the number convicted of breaking the Dangerous Dogs Act has more than trebled in a decade.

In 1997, 237 dog owners were found guilty. By 2007, the figure had soared to 777 - an increase of more than 220 per cent.

The 1991 Act bans four breeds - pit bulls, Japanese Tosa, Dogo Argentino and Fila Brasileiro - but critics, including the Tories and the Liberal Democrats, say it is flawed and needs to be redrawn.
JOHN PAUL MASSEY


Animal charities say the act ignores other breeds which can be just as dangerous and means that responsibly-raised dogs from banned breeds are unfairly targeted. 

Andy Robbins, of the RSPCA, said: 'By specifically targeting four types of dog, it is almost as if the law is saying all dogs are fine apart from any animal of those four types which will be dangerous. 


'We would like to see the law target the minority owners who are using their dog for the wrong means.

'Typically, lads mixed up in gangs are using stereotypically muscular, macho breeds of dog to make themselves look tough and boost their own ego rather than have the company of a pet.'

Steve Goody, of the Blue Cross animal welfare charity, said the soaring number of hospital admissions could be traced back to 'the high number of dogs on the streets being used for the wrong sort of purposes by the wrong sort of people'.

LibDem health spokesman Norman Lamb said: 'We have to tackle the culture of some individuals using dogs as a badge of honour or fashion accessory.'

Ministers yesterday pledged to learn lessons from the investigation into the death of John-Paul Massey at his grandmother's house in Liverpool last month.

The youngster died of horrific injuries after he was shaken like a 'rag doll' by a pit bull owned by his uncle.
He is the fifth child to be killed by a dog in three years.

Police have launched a criminal investigation after revealing the dog, who was shot dead by officers, was an illegal breed.

Jane Kennedy, Labour MP for Liverpool Wavertree, called for a 'detailed report' from Merseyside Police and the Independent Police Complaints Commission 'so that we can fully understand how the complaints made to the police were not followed through and that the Government can respond where possible'.


She asked Home Office Minister David Hanson: 'If it appears that the administrative burdens of the Dangerous Dogs Act contributed in any way, however small, to the tragic death of four-year-old John-Paul Massey will you agree to review it?'

Mr Hanson said: 'I think you raise an important issue. This was a very tragic death. The Home Secretary is in discussions with Defra about what steps, if any, we need to take to make sure we prevent this type of incident occurring again. We will certainly look at this and make sure we do all we can to stop the use of dangerous dogs in this way.'

A dog is for life...

Dog charity refuses to rehouse animals over the festive period to stop New Year return

girl and dog
The country’s largest dog welfare charity is refusing to rehouse animals over the Christmas period to prevent unwanted pets being returned in the New Year.

The Dogs Trust said animals can be viewed and reserved but not taken away – despite all its 18 rehousing centres nationwide being full.

The ban started on December 20 and ends on January 2, giving potential dog owners time to consider whether they really want the animal.

In the 31 years since the charity dreamed up the slogan ‘A dog is for life, not just for Christmas’, there has been a 90 per cent reduction in the number of dogs given
as gifts. Last year the figure was down to 131,400.


But Adam Levy, assistant manager of the Dogs Trust rehoming centre in Harefield, West London, said thousands are still abandoned over Christmas. 
He added: ‘The weeks after Christmas are traditionally one of our busiest periods because lots of people are given puppies as unwanted presents, or people who wanted a dog soon realise they require a lot of time and effort which they are not prepared to give.

‘Some of the excuses we hear from dog owners abandoning their newly acquired pets are truly ludicrous.
A woman once said she was giving up her dog because the colour of its fur clashed with her living room furniture. 

Another irresponsible owner complained the dog had to be given up because it urinated on her favourite rug.
Dog 
‘And a set of owners wanted to give up their new puppy because it was not house-trained when they took it home.’ 

Mr Levy added: ‘We have 150 dogs at our centre and are completely full. At present there is a four-month waiting list for a place at the centre but in the next few weeks we will be contacted by lots of owners wanting to give us their unwanted pet.’

Centre manager Richard Moore said: ‘A dog is a long-term commitment, not a fashion accessory or disposable item that can be upgraded or discarded after just a few months.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1238532/A-dog-life--January-2.html#ixzz0aukF8TRa

Saturday 21 November 2009

The Bichon Family

While many people have heard of the Bichon Frisé few are aware that there are in fact six Bichon breeds, all descendants of the “little white dog of antiquity”. This dog, also known as the “Barbet,” can be traced as far back as the Roman Empire. 

Differing in appearance and personality, each breed was developed in a Mediterranean port city and reached the world beyond through traders and sailors. The breeds were also regarded as treasured gifts by the nobility of the ancient world.

The Bichon Frisé, Bolognese, and Havanese are doublecoated breeds each boasting a topcoat and undercoat, while the Coton de Tulear, Lowchen, and Maltese are singlecoated. All are non-shedding and produce low levels of dander making them a good choice for allergy sufferers and leading to them often being desvribed as hypoallergenic. While each breed has its own unique characteristics and charm none of them can be considered low-maintenance as far as grooming is concerned.
 
The Bichon Frisé is known also as the ‘Tenerife Dog’ because history has it that fourteenth-century sailors found him on that island, fell for his charms and took him back to Europe. During the Renaissance, Italian traders took the little white dog home to Italy where it attracted the attention of nobility and wealthy merchants.

Finding its way to France in the late 1400s, the Bichon became the darling of royalty — a status it enjoyed well into Napoleon’s rule. Because the Bichon was seen as a symbol of the aristocracy during the French Revolution, it was tossed out on its ear, surviving as a street performer with organ grinders and in the circus. 

The Bichon Frise was recognised by the French Kennel Club in 1934 though his recognition in Britain did not occur until after both America and Canada entered him on their registers in the 1970s.a compact and loveable dog whose ancestors came to the Canary Islands with Spanish sailors. With its downy undercoat and springy topcoat curls, the Bichon’s beauty is accentuated by the way it is groomed: scissor-sculpted to accentuate its roundness, its shimmering whiteness contrasted by its dark eyes and jet-black nose and lips. Without brushing several times a week to remove dead hair and prevent matting, skin problems will develop.

The Bolognese is an ancient, charming and intelligent breed of small dog hailing from the centre of Northern Italy. It is after the style of other Bichon types, but has a distinctive non-shedding coat which forms into flocks. These fluffy waves are typically not cut and require careful daily grooming to keep them in top condition. The Bolognese is said to have been a favourite with Russian nobles where servants saved it from extinction during the Russian Revolution. American fanciers imported a Bolognese from Russia in 1991 to breed with specimens gathered in Europe, resuscitating the breed fairly recently. Despite its small size, it is self-important, relishing the role of family watchdog. 

The Coton de Tulear also known as the Royal Dog of Madagascar, was first recognised in the UK in 1990 but has existed in his native Madagascar, particularly on the island of Tula, for several hundred years. It is believed that the breed's ancestors were imported to Madagascar during the 17th century where they became popular in the port of Tulear — a haven for pirates and slave traders. Protected by tribal rulers, the dog became known as the Royal Dog of Madagascar. The Coton takes its name from the French for “cotton,” which is the perfect description for its soft, fluffy coat. Requiring brushing several times a week, the Coton de Tulear is not scissored for the show ring, but owners often opt for a shorter trim. The Coton de Tulear comes in three colors: white, black, and white and tri-colored often sporting lemon and grey tips on its ears.

The Havanese is the Cuban member of the Bichon family and is known in its native country as the Bichon Habanero where it ranks as the national dog of Cuba. The breed reached Cuba as a result of either Spanish colonists or Italian traders and ended up as the playthings of the wealthy. A small, sturdy, long-coated, drop-eared dog with a feisty personality Havanese are longer than they are tall. Their double coats have a light texture and are traditionally unclipped, requiring brushing and combing several times a week. A fun-loving pet, the Havanese is rising fast in popularity and comes in a variety of colors. 

The Lowchen or “little lion dog,” is named for its haircut and while its exact origins are murky it has been known in Europe since the 1500s. Loveable and cheerful, the Lowchen was the favorite of Florentine nobility during the 15th century where ladies of the court took to grooming it to resemble a little lion. The breed was brought back from near extinction by a dedicated Belgian fancier after World War I and as recently as 1960 the Lowchen was described as being the rarest breed in the world. However it has since increased in numbers, being registered in Britain for the first time in 1971 and gaining championship status here just five years later. Untrimmed, the Lowchen’s silky single coat is long and wavy, requiring frequent attention to keep mats at bay. Available in a variety of colors, the Lowchen looks adorably unique when trimmed like a little lion with its full ruff and mane, shorn hindquarters, and tufted tail. 

The Maltese is the smallest member of the Bichon family typically weighing 4 to 6 pounds. Named for the Isle of Malta where it is believed to have been introduced by Phoenician traders, this breed may have been worshipped by the Ancient Egyptians. Its regal coat is long, silky, straight and hangs to floor level therefore requiring daily combing and brushing unless kept clipped.

Saturday 14 November 2009

Dachshunds - the most aggressive breed of dog?

On a recent visit to the vet I had a long conversation about which breeds of dog vets are most wary of treating. Understandably the large fighting breeds such as the Akita, Sharpei and Chow Chow, featured highly. But what may surprise people is that included in this list were Border Collies, Jack Russell Terriers and Dachshunds. Many people are aware that Border Collies are often highly strung and quick to turn but many people might be surprised by the inclusion of JRs and Dachsies.

When selecting a breed of dog to buy many people focus on size rather than the background or origin of the breed. Jack Russells are one of the toughest terrier types to train as they are both strong willed and very energetic. They require firm, consistent discipline and since they are extremely intelligent they will continue to test their boundaries throughout their lives. With JRs if you give them an inch they'll really take a mile. 

As mentioned JRs are a very active breed and need lot of exercise and stimulation to prevent them becoming bored and destructive. Most behavioral problems are due to a lack of companionship, discipline, activity and exercise. If you've only seen perfect, well-behaved JR's, they are ones that were lucky enough to be exercised, well socialized, and trained. 

Aggression is often a problem with JRs and according to the Jack Russell Club of America, JRs are  particularly aggressive with other dogs of the same sex.


All these traits are typical to most terrier breeds but are particularly evident in breeds such as the JR which are still very much working dogs in much of the country


Dachshunds were originally bred to hunt badgers and other small prey. Opinion is still out on whether they should be considered a hound or whether their origin is closer to that of modern terriers. While their origins may still be in debate it is generally agreed that Dachshunds can be difficult little dogs.


Dachshunds boast an impressively loud and deep bark and without proper training can become nuisance barkers. While known for their devotion and loyalty to their owners many dachshunds will whine if left alone and are prone to separation anxiety. As a result of it is not uncommon for them to chew objects in the house to relieve stress. They rank 49th in Stanley Coren's Intelligence of Dogs, being of average working and obedience intelligence. However the dachshund is known for its houdini tendencies and is often able to break out of improperly made cage.


While these little dogs do not have a fearsome reputation (largely due to their small size and comical appearance) research has found that one in five dachshunds have bitten or tried to bite strangers, and a similar number have attacked other dogs; in addition one in 12 have snapped at their owners. This puts them at the top of the list of 33 breeds rated for their aggression, after academics analyzed the behavior of thousands of dogs.

Dr James Serpell, one of the researchers, said smaller breeds might be more genetically predisposed towards aggressive behaviour than larger dogs.

“Reported levels of aggression in some cases are concerning, with rates of bites or bite attempts rising as high as 20 per cent toward strangers and 30 per cent toward unfamiliar dogs,” he added.

Until now, research into canine aggression has almost exclusively involved analysis of dog bite statistics. But the researchers said these were potentially misleading as most bites were not reported. Big dogs might have acquired a reputation for being consistently more aggressive simply because their bites were more likely to require medical attention. 

The study conducted by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania’s Center for the Interaction of Animals and Society, is considered one of the most extensive of its kind and is the first to report replicated findings of breed differences in aggression, collected basic and behavior-related dog data from two separate groups.

The first group, consisting of members of 11 American Kennel Club recognized national breed clubs, such as The Labrador Retriever Club and The English Springer Spaniel Field Trial Association and the second involved an online survey both reached similar conclusions.

Dachshunds were one of the breeds that scored higher than average for aggression directed to both humans and dogs, putting them towards the top of the list.

Akitas, Pit Bull Terriers and Stafforshire Bull Terriers, breeds which have “bad boy” reputations, typically scored highly for dog-directed aggression - a result of their 'dog fighting' breed heritage. When they did injure humans, however, the injuries were understandably more severe than those inflicted by the smaller dogs.

Often the small size of dogs plays a part in the development of aggressive tendencies since small dogs are more likely to feel threatened by 'innocent'  human or canine interactions.


“Small size very likely plays a large role in the development of fear-based aggression among some breeds,” Duffy explained. 

“Smaller dogs may feel more threatened by other dogs and people — a perception that may be well founded.”

Other breeds with a greater tendency to bite humans included Jack Russell Terriers, Australian Cattle Dogs, Cocker Spaniels and Beagles.

On the “least aggressive” end of the spectrum were Basset Hounds, Golden Retrievers, Labradors, Siberian Huskies, Bernese Mountain Dogs, Brittany Spaniels, Greyhounds and Whippets.

Interestingly enough, several of these dogs also rated low for “watchdog behavior” and “territorial defense” behaviors, suggesting that they tend to be lovable family pets, but are less vigilant watchdogs than their smaller cousins such as Chihuahuas and Dachshunds. 
Much as in humans, behavioral patterns in dogs seem to result from a combination of environmental influences and genetics. 

Paul Jones, a Mars Veterinary genetics researcher at the Waltham Center for Pet Nutrition in the US, and his co-author identified locations in a dog’s DNA that contain genes believed to contribute to behavior, trainability and longevity, as well as body and skull shape, weight, fur color and length.

“By applying this research approach, we may be able to decipher how genes contribute to physical or behavioral traits that affect many breeds,” said Jones, who indicated future applications might include tailor-made foods and medicines, along with specific recommendations to individuals about what would be the “most lifestyle-appropriate pet for an owner.”

However Duffy countered that “just because there is a genetic component to behavior does not necessarily mean that it is predestined.”

“Anyone looking to bring a dog into their home should find out as much as possible about the individual dog’s history and temperament,” she advised. 

“Certainly some breeds are better with children than others on average. However, it wouldn’t make sense to pass up a well-socialized, well-trained, non-aggressive Rottweiler for an atypically aggressive Labrador Retriever.”.

Friday 13 November 2009

Everything Islington residents need to know about your dog and the law - full text of Islington Dog Strategy



Islington Council Dog Strategy
APRIL 2009 


Contents
1  Introduction………………………………………………………………. 3
2  Executive Summary…………………………………………………….. 3
3  Background and Aims…………………………………………………. 3
 

4  Current Policies and Resources…………………………………...… 4
 4.1.0 ♦ Homes for Islington………………………………………………. 4
 4.2.0 ♦ Street Environment Services……………………………………. 4
 4.3.0 ♦ Greenspace and Leisure Services……………………………… 4
 4.4.0 ♦ Animal Welfare Officer…………………………………………… 4
 

5 5.1.0 Strategy…………………………………………………………………… 5
 

6  Promoting Education and Awareness……………………………….  5
 6.1.0 ♦ Responsible Dog Ownership……………………………………. 5
 6.2.0 ♦ Young People and Dogs…………………………………………. 6
 6.3.0 ♦ Behaviour Around Dogs………………………………………….. 6
 

7  Strengthening Enforcement………………………………………….. 7
 7.1.0 ♦ Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005………….. 7
 7.2.0 ♦ Islington Dog Control Orders…………………………….………. 8
 7.3.0 ♦ Education and Advice…………………………………………….. 8
 7.4.0 ♦ Fixed Penalty Notices……………………………………………. 9
 7.5.0. ♦ Disposal/Cleansing and Removal………………………………. 10
 7.6.0 ♦ Signage……………………………………………………………. 10
 7.7.0 ♦ Equalities and Exemptions………………………………………. 10
 7.8.0 ♦ Dog Related Legislation…………………………………………. 11
 7.9.0 ♦ Dangerous Dogs Act 1991………………………………………. 11
 7.10.0 ♦ Deed not Breed……………………………………………………. 11
 7.11.0 ♦ Dogs Act 1871……………………………………………………… 11
 7.12.0 ♦ Control of Dogs Order 1992 (Stray Dogs)………………………. 12
 7.13.0 ♦ Dogs Fouling of Land Act 1996 & Bylaws………………………. 12
 7.14.0 ♦ Environmental Protection Act 1990……………………………… 12
 7.15.0 ♦ Animal Welfare Act 2006………………………………………….. 12
 7.16.0 ♦ Enforcement Officers…………………………………………….. 13
       
8  Developing a Joined Up Approach…………………………………... 14
 8.1.0 ♦ Lead Department…………………………………………………. 14
 8.2.0 ♦ Training…………………………………………………………….. 14
 8.3.0 ♦ Targeting Hotspots/Information Sharing………………………..  14
 8.4.0 ♦ Awareness Raising & Education Campaigns………………….. 15
    
9  Monitoring and Review……….………………………………………… 16
10 Complaints……………………………………………..…………………. 16
11 Useful Contacts………………………………………………………….. 17
  Communications Plan.…………………………………………..……… 17


ISLINGTON DOG STRATEGY 
1 Introduction

1.1 Islington Council is committed to maintaining a clean and safe environment for the benefit of
everyone in the borough.  This commitment recognises our responsibility to keep the streets
and local environment clear of litter, obstructions and deal with other local environmental
quality issues.  
1.2 The presence of dumped waste, litter, dog fouling, graffiti and other environmental crime may
also contribute to people’s fear of crime and their perception of how well they think their
council is performing.
1.3 The One Islington Corporate Plan 2006-20091 highlights the link between quality of life and
the quality of the external environment and it includes our commitment to minimise harmful
impacts and our intentions to create a cleaner, greener and safer place to live, work in and
visit and provide services that are considered excellent in the eyes of our residents.
 
2 Executive Summary

2.1 Islington Council recognises the importance of creating a usable and enjoyable environment
for all who work in, visit or live in the borough. Dog related issues such as fouling and
intimidating dogs could adversely affect the environment and people’s enjoyment of it. 
2.2 During the 2005 Measuring Customer Perceptions survey of Islington residents, 45% of
respondents sited dog fouling as the number one environmental issue that needs addressing. 
2.3 Islington Council has produced this Dog Strategy in order to clarify how we intend to tackle
irresponsible dog ownership and antisocial dog behaviour. The strategy outlines how the Council will address dog control issues such as: 

  • Irresponsible dog ownership  
  • Dangerous dogs
  • Dog fouling  
  • Stray dogs
2.4 The strategy also outlines how we will encourage and promote responsible dog ownership and
enforce legislation on dog control, in line with the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act
2005 - Dog Control Orders.
2.5 This document covers 2 key areas:
♦ The strategy  

♦ The action/communications plan

3 Background and Aims
3.1 We have listened to people’s concerns about local issues that can impact on their quality of
life. Dog fouling and the anti social behaviour of some dog owners who fail to control their
dogs in public places are amongst issues that concern residents the most. People feel we
could do more to tackle the roots of these issues by providing more education, advice and
awareness raising, backed up by officers issuing some form of penalty.
3.2 The strategy part of this document outlines how we will encourage and promote responsible
dog ownership and enforce the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005 (CNEA
2005) on dog control as well as how other legislation affects what we do.
3.3 The action plan then details how the various services and agencies will liaise with each other
to ensure that this strategy is delivered successfully.

4 Current Services and Resources
4.1.0 Homes for Islington
4.1.1 In line with the ‘One Islington’ vision - Homes for Islington is committed to working with other
Council partners to ensure that they provide information on responsible dog ownership to their
residents who have pets. They have also put resources in place to deal with enforcement on
their land.
4.1.2 Currently Homes for Islington (HFI) residents can contact their Area Housing Office to report
any of the issues listed in 2.3. The Estate Services and Tenancy Management Officers would
then identify offenders and offer education and advice first before taking enforcement action
under the conditions of the tenancy or lease. 
4.1.3 There is no exercising of dogs throughout HFI estates and offenders may also be reported to
the Area Housing Office. As a very last resort they may seek repossession of the residence for
anti-social behaviour. 
4.14 HFI Out of Hours Anti-social Behaviour Officers have authority from the Director of
Environment and Regeneration to enforce the dog control orders and have combined this with
promoting responsible dog ownership on estates by distributing information leaflets to
residents.
4.1.5 HFI caretakers are responsible for cleansing communal areas of estates and they will respond
to specific reports of dog fouling and remove dog fouling in these areas (except for shrub
beds) as soon as reasonably possible.


4.2.0 Street Environment Services
4.2.1 Currently anyone in the community can report dog fouling issues if they occur on the public
highway via Contact Islington on 0207 527 2000. Contact Islington will pass the information on
to Street Environment Services.  
4.2.2 Street Environment Officers will ensure that the street is swept by Enterprise PLC ( the
Council’s street cleansing contractor) on the scheduled day and remove all dog fouling along
with the litter etc. 
4.2.3 Street Environment Services administration team logs all reports of dog fouling received via
Contact Islington and these hotspots are used as a basis for enforcement patrols.
4.2.4 The area based Street Environment Officers will investigate problems of dog fouling within 24
hours of receipt and may put up warning signs at the location or deliver leaflets to local
residents advising them of the legislation and requesting that they clean up after their dogs. If
they observe anyone not doing so officers will give them fixed penalty notices.


4.3.0 Greenspace Services
4.3.1 Dog control issues can be reported to Greenspace Services via Contact Islington on 020 7527
2000. The report will then be passed on to the appropriate Greenspace Ranger who is
responsible for managing the borough’s parks. 
4.3.2 The Greenspace Ranger will investigate the problem and ensure that adequate signage is on
display. If the problem is persistent the Ranger can organize park user education and offer
advice around dog control in collaboration with the Greenspace Park Patrol Service. 
4.3.3 The Parks Patrol Service has an enforcement role unlike the Rangers and have the powers to
enforce the new legislation. Currently there are 9 Park Patrol Officers who are trained and
able to handle dog behavioural issues, with at least 3 officers on patrol at any one time.                             


4.4.0 Animal Welfare Officer (Dog Warden)
4.4.1 The role of Islington’s single Animal Welfare Officer is also to deal with dangerous or stray
dogs in conjunction with the Police. The role also includes community liaison and education on
dog-related issues. Our Animal Welfare Officer can be contacted on 020 7527 3222.
 

5 Strategy
5.1.0 One of the strategy’s main aims is to provide a framework within which we will address dog
fouling, as Islington residents have identified this as a priority local environmental issue. The
strategy also sets out how the Council will address other dog control issues. It includes how
we will communicate internally and externally on dog related issues to raise awareness, who
will educate and advise on these issues and how services will work together to ensure
effective and consistent dog control services borough wide. 
5.1.1 The core of this strategy’s success is the implementation of proportionate, well-publicised and
enforceable dog control orders under the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005
(CNEA 2005). 
5.1.2 Dog control orders will allow officers to identify dog owners who need advice and assistance
to comply with the law and improve their dog ownership skills.  
5.1.3 Appropriate dog control orders also allow enforcement officers to identify and deal with those
irresponsible dog owners who persist in allowing their dogs to spoil the local environment and
amenities for others.


6 Promoting Education and Awareness 


6.1.0 Responsible Dog Ownership
6.1.1 In the past 20 years or so there has been a large increase in the amount of research
supporting the general notion that “pets are good for you”. A study of the relationship between
pet ownership and cardiovascular health (Friedman et al 1980)2 showed that pet owners were
more likely to be alive one year after being discharged from a coronary care unit than non-
owners. Pet owners also tended to have reduced blood pressure.  
6.1.2 In addition, pets can decrease loneliness and depression by providing companionship, an
interesting and varied lifestyle and an impetus for nurturing. They can also reduce anxiety by
providing an external focus for attention, promoting feelings of safety and providing a source
of contact comfort.
6.1.4 This strategy supports this notion and supports the promotion of responsible dog ownership,  -
Useful links to guidelines that inform dog owners of the current legislation affecting dogs in
Islington, how to look after dogs correctly and useful dog related organisations such as the
Dog’s Trust and the Kennel Club can be found on Islington’s website. 


6.1.5 Topics accessible from our website will cover basic good dog care principles:
♦ Adequate and regular exercise 

♦ Sensible feeding
♦ Access to veterinary care 

♦ Identification
♦ Neutering

♦ Being responsible to other people   
♦ Cleaning up after your dog 

6.2.0 Young People and Dogs
6.2.1 While the majority of dog owners are responsible and enjoy the benefits of dog ownership,
there is a small minority who are perceived to cause concern regarding their dog’s behaviour.
This situation may sometimes be caused by a lack of experience or understanding of dogs by
their owners. Young dog owners can be particularly vulnerable in this regard. While our efforts
to promote responsible dog ownership will be accessible to all, emphasis will be placed on
ensuring that younger age groups have access to advice, information and encouragement.
We intend to build upon previous work in this area: 
6.2.2. Since 2005 the environmental charity - Groundwork, in partnership with Islington Council has
carried out workshops in primary schools and youth clubs. Groundwork worked with the
children to educate them about responsible dog ownership and to design anti-dog fouling
‘flags’ and poems.  
6.2.3 The children then visited nearby open spaces identified as having dog fouling problems and
put the flags in the ground in affected areas. The flags were left for a day or two for dog
owners to see, to encourage them to pick up after their pets and remind them of the impact
their behaviour has on children.  
6.2.4 Groundwork then continued work at the open space locations with Islington’s Animal Welfare
Officer to promote and deliver ‘good dog’ training sessions.  This involved dogs and their
owners attending a training session where they had to perform a series of obedience test to
achieve a Kennel Club Bronze award.
6.2.5 In 2006 the Parks Patrol Service created dog awareness events called Top Dog London and
Parks Dogs projects in response to reports of anti social behaviour amongst youths with dogs.
6.2.6 The projects took on a holistic approach to solving the problem by providing free dog-related
training and equipment to young people at accessible locations and times for them. They also
provided the participants with diversionary activities by uniting them in a common interest and
building a rapport between the officers and the youths during which wider social issues could
be addressed. Youths who participated were rewarded with prizes and a better understanding
of how to change the negative public perception towards them by using their improved dog
handling and welfare skills.   
6.2.7 Officers will continue to use these and similar projects when setting up local awareness
events. The strategy action plan details how they will be incorporated into a co-ordinated
regime of further promoting education and awareness. 
 

6.3.0 Behaviour Around Dogs
6.3.1 Most dogs are great with people and children and when problems do occur this is often down
to people not knowing how to act around dogs properly and how to treat them with respect.
The Dog’s Trust’s useful guidelines for children and those who are unfamiliar with dogs
include:
 ♦ Not to play with a dog, unless the owner says so. Always ask the owner before               
approaching the dog.
♦ Never rush up to a dog. Hold out a hand and let him come to you. Leave the dog if he
doesn’t want to come.
♦  Don’t stare into a dog’s eyes. 
♦ Try not to make sudden movements or loud noises that may frighten the dog. 

♦ If a dog growls or is unfriendly, stay calm and slowly walk away. Don’t run!
♦ Children should never take a dog for a walk on their own. An adult should always
accompany a child in case they need help to control the dog.
♦ Don’t disturb or approach a dog if he is eating, drinking or is tied up.
 

7 Strengthening Enforcement 
7.0.1 After education and awareness raising have been used legislative enforcement is one of the
keys to reducing dog fouling and dealing with control issues. Unfortunately some dog owners
will only change their habits if made to by enforcement; therefore the correct level of
enforcement is crucial.


7.1.0 Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005 (CNEA 2005)
7.1.1 The CNEA 2005 is legislation that became available to local councils in May 2006 for tackling
low level anti social behaviour.
7.1.2 Islington Council listened to local peoples concerns about local environment issues and
agreed to use this legislation formally in February 2007. Authorized officers can use this Act
along with providing advice and awareness raising, to deal with issues like littering, dumping
waste, graffiti, fly posting and dog control.
7.1.3 In relation to dog control, the CNEA 2005 makes it an offence to do any of the following on
any designated land open to the air on at least one side that the public are entitled or
permitted to have access to with or without payment: 


1. Failing to pick up your dog fouling
2. Failing to keep your dog on a lead
3. Allowing your dog to enter an area from which they are excluded
4. Failing to put your dog on a lead when asked to by an authorized officer 

5. Walking more than a specified number of dogs

7.1.4 It is important to note that under the CNEA 2005 penalties for any of the offences listed above
can only be issued after a local council has consulted with the community and created formal
Dog Control Orders. Under Section 55 of the CNEA 2005 local authorities can create dog
control orders on all or parts of their land.
7.1.5 In order to consult with the community, local councils are required to publicize their proposals
in at least one local newspaper and invite the community to public accessible venues in the
borough to fill in questionnaires and make comments:


♦ Indicate the start and end dates of the consultation (At least 28 days from the publication
date)
♦ Summarise which dog control orders may apply
♦ ldentify the land to which each order may apply
♦ Give access to maps to view the proposed dog control areas
♦ Give details of where any comments/representations can be sent
♦ Make all details available on the council’s webpage 


7.1.6 At the end of the consultation period, local councils should consider the responses and create
Dog Control Orders that are reasonable and in line with public opinion. 
7.1.7 Once an order has been agreed and made, a public notice should be published in a borough
wide newspaper/publication and on the local council’s web page, detailing the order(s) at least
7 days before they come into force.
7.1.8 The process described above is contained in the CNEA 2005 and is the same process if an
order is to be revoked or changed significantly.


7.2.0 Islington Dog Control Orders

7.2.1 In compliance with the CNEA 2005 Islington Council carried out an extensive public
consultation from 3rd March to 21st April 2008. Our consultation was based on Responsible
Dog Ownership and took into account whether the orders suited the needs of the community
and were proportionate, fair and enforceable. 
7.2.2 We had over 1700 replies from non-dog owners and dog owners alike. There was

overwhelming support for the introduction of new dog control orders with many additional
suggestions about where they should apply.
7.2.3 Over 99% respondents agreed that dog owners should clean up after their dogs in any public
place. Over 97% agreed that authorised staff should be able to instruct dog owners to put their
dogs on a lead in any public place. 95% of respondents agreed that children’s play areas and
other games and sports areas should be dog free. In addition you told us that you wanted
existing dog-free areas especially ornamental squares - to stay dog free. 
7.2.4 We listened to the responses we received and on the 14th July 2008 we implemented 3 dog
control orders  making each of the following an offence in Islington:



  •  Failing to pick up your dog fouling  - in any public space
  • Allowing your dog to enter an area from which they are excluded no dog area – in specific areas 
  • Failing to put your dog on a lead when asked to by an authorized officer - in any public space. 

7.2.5 During the consultation many comments were received about our proposal. We listened to
these responses and as a result some new sites were added in addition to the no dog
(exclusion) areas proposed in the consultation.


The additional sites  included as dog exclusion areas are:


Arlington Square, Batishill Street Gardens, Canonbury Square, Compton Terrace, Gibson
Square, Lonsdale Square, Milner Square, Northampton Square, Penn Road Gardens, Percival Street (Homes for Islington area), Percy Circus, St. Silas Gardens, Thornhill Crescent Garden and Wilmington Square.


7.2.6 In addition, there were a small amount of sites where current practice is that dogs are walked
on leads. On these sites we have asked authorized officers to ask all dog walkers to put their
dogs on leads and issue fines if this is not complied with.
7.2.7 To view a map of the all the Dog Control Order areas, use the Interactive Maps link on
Islington’s website, then choose Recreation and Leisure from the list on the right of that page.
 

7.3.0 Education and Advice
7.3.1 Since July 2008 we have undertaken a campaign of providing education and advice regarding
responsible dog ownership - we’ve handed out hundreds of leaflets and “dog poo bags” and warnings to people with dogs who are contravening Dog Control Orders in our parks, open spaces and on the street. 
7.3.2 Officers come across dog walkers who persist in contravening the dog fouling - dog control
order despite receiving previous warnings. It became apparent that some irresponsible dog
owners will only clean up when told to do so and that this approach does not always achieve
the required behavioural change.
7.3.3 In December 2008 a report was presented to Full Council around Greener, Cleaner Safer –
Promoting Civic Pride. Amongst other issues, it highlighted a change of strategy towards
firmer enforcement for persistent offenders.
7.3.4 The report noted that the focus has been to encourage people to do the right thing and this
has had some success in changing people’s attitudes and behaviour. However in order to
build on this success and tackle those engaged with low level anti social behaviour, it was
considered the right time to change the focus from encouragement to enforcement.
7.3.5 It was agreed that the Council should join up enforcement coverage and adopt a harder line
approach in tackling anti social behaviour through the use of fixed penalty notices. This will
show that the Council is prepared to make a stand against the small minority engaged in anti-
social behaviour. This new approach would help to improve the cleanliness and orderliness of
the street environment and improve local environmental quality.
 

7.4.0 Fixed Penalty Notices
7.4.1 Fixed penalty notices (FPNs) are an opportunity for offenders to avoid prosecution for any of
the dog control offences shown in 7.2.4 by payment of the penalty.  These are issued by
authorized officer when they directly witness or have evidence that an offence has been
committed within a dog control area. Officers should only issue FPNs where there is adequate
evidence to support a prosecution in court if a penalty is not paid. 
7.4.2 Dog control fixed penalty notices are set at £80.00. This amount is reduced to £50.00 if the
penalty is paid within 10 days from the date the notice was given.  
7.4.3 The general process and timescale for fixed penalty notice administration is as follows:   

• Fixed penalty notice issued
• Offender has 10 working days within which to pay (early payment discount applies)
• If no payment received/representation – after 28 working days the offender receives a
Notice of Intended Prosecution
• A further 21 working days is allowed after the Notice of Intended Prosecution 
• If no payment is received after this 21 day period the case file is prepared for Litigation 
• Offenders can be prosecuted up to 6 months from the date of the offence  

7.4.4 Trained officers carry out high-visibility patrols, observe situations and approach any dog
owner they see breaking the law. They will issue fixed penalty notices to anyone they 'catch'
committing an offence and the offender will be asked to take control of their dog and or clear
up after it. Officers patrol in areas where they have intelligence or information that this anti
social behaviour is occurring. We do not use video surveillance and rely on officers to take
immediate direct action should they observe offences during routine patrols.
7.4.5 In law, an FPN can be issued to anyone over the age of 10. Islington Council’s duty under the
Children Act 2004 requires that we discharge our functions with regard to the need to
safeguard and uphold the welfare of children.   

7.4.6 Once an offence has been committed and the age of the offender has been ascertained
officers are advised to use care and sensitivity when dealing with young people. Where the
person is young (10 years and under), the officer will give them a verbal warning and remind
them of their responsibility to control their dog or to pick up it’s fouling and ask them to do so
and give them a Responsible Dog Ownership leaflet and dog fouling bag (where supplies
permit).
7.4.7 The issuing of FPNs to 10–15 year olds will be undertaken through a more consultative
approach with parents or legal guardians if they are in the vicinity.  In such cases young
person will be encouraged to contact/notify their parents, legal guardian as soon as possible
before the FPN is issued. Where this is not possible the officer may decide to give them a
verbal warning etc as above. FPNs may be issued to 16 and 17 year olds in the same way as
for adults.
7.4.8 The CNEA 2005 makes it an offence to fail to give a proper name and address to the
authorised officer when requested to do so for the purposes of issuing an FPN. This issue will
be tackled by effective joined up working with the Police Safer Neighbourhood Officers or
Police.
7.4.9 Islington Council may retain any funds accrued from the serving of FPNs. The use of FPNs is
not intended to increase the Councils income. Any payments collected will be used to help
offset the costs of the enforcement function by helping fund for example, relevant educational,
operational and publicity initiatives.
7.4.10 While the vast majority of dog owners have a responsible attitude and obey the new Dog
Control Orders, there’s still a hardcore few dog owners of all ages whose anti social behaviour
and irresponsible action cause concern to the many law abiding residents.  They give all dog
owners a bad name, which is clearly not fair.
7.4.11 Our emphasis will continue to be on education, prevention and responsible dog
ownership. However, we are getting tough and we will issue fines and even prosecute
offenders as a last resort, as sometimes this is the only way we will change some people’s
unacceptable behaviour.
 

7.5.0 Disposal/Cleansing and Removal
7.5.1 The strategy recommends that dog owners should always clean up after their pet/s and
therefore resources will be targeted on making disposal easier, with an emphasis on
education and enforcement rather than cleansing. Cleansing is expensive, requires ongoing
resource allocation and encourages people not to act as responsible dog owners. 
7.5.2 The Council has phased out the use of specific dog waste bins on all land and encourage the
use of litterbins, which is now accompanied by appropriate signage to remind people to use
this as an appropriate means to dispose of properly bagged dog fouling. 
 

7.6.0 Signage
7.6.1 In order to ensure that dog owners are aware of the existence of dog control orders we have
replaced existing signage in Greenspace and HFI land with robust signs encouraging
responsible dog owner behaviour and specifying which dog control order applies.
7.6.2 There are now prominent signs around the borough in parks and Islington estates highlighting
the law and penalties. We have put signs on the network of over 2000 litterbins in the borough
to indicate the existence of the relevant dog control order and to encourage/praise the use of
the bins for disposing of litter including bagged dog fouling. 
 

7.7.0 Equalities and Exemptions
7.7.1 With reference to section 7.1.3 the offences under Orders 1 (Failing to pick up your dog fouling) does not apply to the following groups:
♦ A person who is registered as a blind person in a register compiled under section 29 of the
National Assistance Act 1948 
♦ A person who has a disability which affects their mobility, manual dexterity, physical co-
ordination or ability to lift, carry or otherwise move everyday objects and relies on the
assistance of a dog trained by Dogs for the Disabled (registered charity number 700454),
Support Dogs (registered charity number 1088281) or Canine Partners for Independence
(registered charity number 803680). 
7.7.2 In addition to those listed in 7.1.3 under Order 3 (Allowing your dog to enter a no dog area) 
♦ A deaf person in respect of a dog trained by Hearing Dogs for Deaf People (registered
charity number 293358) is also exempt.
7.7.3 No offence is committed where a person has a reasonable excuse for taking their dog onto, or
allowing it to enter or remain on the land where the owner, occupier or other person or authority
who has control of the land has consented (generally or specifically) to their doing so. 
7.7.4 CNEA 2005 regulations specifically state that being unaware that your dog has fouled or not
having the means to remove the fouling is not a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with the
order and may still result in an FPN being issued.
 

7.8.0 Other Dog Related Legislation
7.8.1 The Dangerous Dogs Act 1991
7.8.2 This Act bans the ownership, breeding, sale, exchange and advertising for sale of Pit Bull
Terriers, Japanese Tosa, Dogo Argentino and Fila Brasiliero.
7.8.3 Some dogs of these breeds may be exempt from the ban, but owners must carry a Certificate
of Exemption with them and ensure that the dog is neutered, micro-chipped, insured, muzzled
and on a lead at all times when in a public place. Failure to do this may result in the dog being
seized by either the Police or the Animal Welfare Officer. The provisions under CNEA 2005 do
not alter the existing powers the Police have to deal with dangerous dogs under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991. 
7.8.4 Dangerous dogs can also be any breed of dogs that can be classed by their behaviour as being
dangerously out of control in a public place or where they are not permitted to be and have caused
injury or given grounds for reasonable apprehension that it would do so. 
7.8.5 If a dog is one of the banned breeds or if a dog has bitten or attacked anyone and is still
presenting a danger to the public in a public place then the Police should be informed immediately
via 999. Under Section 5 of this Act the Police can seize the dog and take it to a secure kennel. If
an incident has already taken place then these should be reported to the Met Call Centre on 0207
704 1212 and they may use then a warrant to seize the dog. The Police may then prosecute the
owner. 
7.8.6 If authorised council officers feel dogs behaviour is unacceptable and anti social or this has been reported to them (e.g. Ripping off tree bark, mauling on park furniture/ equipment, etc) then their first option will be to locate the owner and make them aware of their dogs intimidating behaviour. Officers will offer the owner advice and within the dog control order applicable ask the owner to take to control their dog appropriately.


7.9.0 Dogs Act 1871
7.9.1 Members of the public can use this Act to bring about civil proceedings if they feel that a dog is dangerous and not kept under proper control.
7.9.2 Although the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 is used more frequently, successful proceedings under
the Dogs Act means that the court can impose a control order requiring a dog to be kept under
proper control at all times with along with other conditions if necessary. It also means that the in
rare cases that an owner can be banned from keeping a dog.
 

7.10.0 Deed Not Breed
7.10.1 Islington Council is in support of the deed not breed lobby which calls for an amendment to the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 to adequately deal with aggressive or dangerous dogs (deeds) based
on the actions of a dog rather than its breed. This could be implemented by introducing a more
effective anti social behaviour order or acceptable behavior contracts type of control systems to
allow for suitably stringent controls on owners of dogs that display unwarranted aggression,
whatever the breed of dog. 
7.10.2 We are aware that the 1991 Act was amended by the Dangerous Dogs (Amendment) Act of 1997. This amendment has been widely welcomed, as it acknowledges the fact that not all dogs who are deemed to be of a 'type' mentioned in the Act pose a threat to the public, and as such need not always be put to sleep. The importance of this amendment is that it states that no dog need be
destroyed if a court is satisfied that it constitutes no danger to public safety. Instead, once the
court is satisfied of their suitable temperament and their owner's commitment to responsible care,
dogs may be registered on the Index of Exempted Dogs, micro chipped, neutered and returned to
their owner's care.
7.10.3 The implementation of this strategy and dog control orders will go some way to deal with
irresponsible owners. Such controls would include keeping the dog under control when asked to
by an authorised officer (including use of lead), training, rehabilitation of the dog, and keeping
dogs in a way that discourages any inappropriate aggression. We will continue to support relevant
legislative changes that underpin the Council’s commitment to responsible dog ownership.
 

7.11.0 Control of Dogs Order 1992 (Stray Dogs)
7.11.1 Under this legislation dog owners are required to ensure that their dogs always have a collar on with the owners name and address on it or on a tag attached to it when they are out on the public highway or in a public place.
7.11.2 If authorised officers find dogs with none of the above requirements they can report them as stray dogs to the Animal Welfare Officer. Under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 Sects. 149-150, the Animal Welfare Officer can seize any dog that is not in the presence of its owner even if it is wearing the identification details above.
7.11.3 Stray dogs are then kept and cared for in secure kennels for a minimum of 7 days and if they are not claimed or the owner does not respond to a notice to come and collect it then it may be either sold, given to another owner, sent for re-housing at local dog rescue homes or as a very last resort destroyed. For security reasons for both the animals and the staff caring for them the location of the Council's Animal Pound is not disclosed to the public).
7.11.4 The Council’s Animal Welfare Officer keeps a record of all stray dogs found in the Animal Welfare Service Office at the address detailed in Section 12. The public via appointment during, office hours can access the register. 

7.12.0 The Dogs (Fouling of Land) Act 1996 & Byelaws
7.12.1 Section 65 of the CNEA 2005 repeals the Dogs (Fouling of Land) Act 1996 and the new dog
control orders replace all existing Islington bylaws created in 1976 on any land in the borough
where the CNEA 2005 order deals with the same offence.
7.12.2 New byelaws can now only be created for dog control offences that are not contained in the
CNEA 2005. Until dog control orders are created the current byelaws applicable to specific
Greenspace land are still enforceable.


7.13.0 The Environmental Protection Act 1990 (as amended)
7.13.1 Section 68 of the CNEA 2005 amends the Environmental Protection Act 1990 by taking the
responsibility to deal with stray dogs from the Police and giving it to local authorities. This
became formal in April 2008. 


7.14.0 Animal Welfare Act 2006
7.14.1 The Animal Welfare Act 2006 introduced in England on April 6th 2007 places a legal
responsibility on those who care for or own animals including dogs to allow them to exhibit
normal behaviour patterns i.e. walk/run freely and to provide a suitable diet i.e. food and
exercise. A person commits an offence if they inflict deliberate cruelty or their act or failure to
act causes an animal to suffer unnecessarily. It is hoped the Act as well as the new codes of
practice - which will be introduced in 2008 - will not only improve general animal welfare but also
help vastly reduce the number of stray dog.
7.14.2 The Animal Welfare Officer is authorized to act under this piece of legislation and implements
it during the course of exercising his duties. We will also take the requirements of this Act into
consideration when creating our dog control orders. 
 

7.15.0 Enforcement Officers
7.15.1 Below is a summary of authorised officers able to enforce dog control orders in Islington:
Click here to go to Islington Council website for information on which officers can enforce the legislation
7.15.2 The Out of Hours Anti Social Behaviour Officers have been identified as both an education and advice and enforcement resource for the purpose of delivering this strategy for Homes for Islington and will be in operation between 14:00 – 22:00. They will be able to do this under delegated authority from Islington Council.
7.15.3 The current Park Patrol Officers are the only enforcement officers intended to patrol for
Greenspace and Leisure. Greenspace Rangers have no enforcement powers as their role is
primarily about community development/ engagement. The rangers will report incidents and collect
evidence, for the Park Patrol to action. 
7.15.4 The Street Environment Officers’ role under their delegated authority from Director of
Environment will continue to include enforcement duties on the public highway along with
monitoring Islington’s waste contractor to ensure that litterbins are emptied regularly and
street cleanliness standards are achieved. 
7.15.5 The Street Environment Wardens set up in April 2007 will provide a more visible community
support function. They will be more involved in working within hard to reach groups and ensuring
that they are aware of their roles and responsibilities on local community and environmental
issues. They are also able to carry out an enforcement function when it becomes necessary under
their delegated authority from Director of Environment. 
7.15.6 The Warden Team will be working gathering evidence for producing acceptable behaviour
contracts where advice and support are not effective, to this end they will work closely with the
Council’s Anti Social Behaviour Team and Police Community Support Officers (PCSOs) and
Animal Welfare Officer on a borough wide basis.
7.15.7 The Police Community Support Officers (PCSO’s) are allocated to Islington’s 16 wards forming the 16 Police Safer Neighbourhood Teams. The PCSO’s under the new Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005 will also be enforcing dog control offences and issuing FPNs to offenders. The Police also work in partnership with Islington’s Public Protection Services to deal with stray and dangerous dogs.
7.15.8 The strategy brings together operational services - Greenspace, HFI, Registered Social
Landlords, Street Environment Services, Police Safer Neighbourhood Teams as well as the
Anti – Social Behaviour Team, the Animal Welfare Officer and other advisory agencies such
as the Dogs Trust and the Kennel Club who have an impact on dog control issues and
ensures a joined up approach is delivered. This joint approach means the cause of dog control
issues will be understood and tackled and not just relocated as an unsolved problem from site
to site.


8 Developing a Joined Up Approach

8.1.0 Lead Department
8.1.1 Street Environment Services are responsible for leading on this strategy and co-ordinating it’s
implementation and involvement from the other services/agencies listed below:
8.1.2 The approach of this strategy relies on strong partnership working.  Through partnership
working the aim of the strategy can be met in a shared and efficient manner.  In order to seek
the most effective operation of this strategy we aim to work with, amongst others, the
following:
8.1.3 The authorised officers described in 7.15.1 will be responsible for providing operational
services. They along with representatives of the agencies listed above will meet to discuss
related matters on a periodic basis from the date of publication of this document.
 

8.2.0 Training
8.2.1 All authorised officers identified in Section 7.15.1 will receive training on the new legislation
and how to enforce it. The courses undertaken before any enforcement is carried out will
include: 

♦ Equalities issues 
♦ Customer Care
♦ Conflict Management 

♦ Dog Behavioural Awareness
♦ Gathering evidence

♦ Court proceedings

8.2.2 Only competent officers who have appropriate qualifications or experience will be authorised
to take enforcement action.  Officers will also have sufficient training and understanding of our
enforcement policies and their area of work to ensure a consistent approach to their duties.  
8.2.3 All officers carry visible identification picture cards, at all times and an authorization card to
show what legislation they are able to enforce. The Director of Environment and Regeneration
endorses this. 
8.2.4 Information will also be made available to community groups such as “Friends of” groups,
Tenant & Resident Associations and the “Eyes of Islington” on request. This will include an
update on the new legislation, the enforcement structure in place and how to report an
incident, and collect evidence.
 

8.3.0 Targeting Hotspots/Information Sharing
8.3.1 All authorised officers from operational areas identified in Section 7.15.0 will react to reported
dog control incidents across the borough: 
Where possible officers will attend to public complaints within 24 hours from being notified and
take action to identify the offender(s), take information from witnesses and arrange for areas
to be cleansed (if relevant).
Locations of persistent complaints/incidents will be prioritised from:
♦ Contact Islington complaints 

♦ Operational officer observations 
♦ HFI residents 

♦ Dog Tracker (Park Patrol service database)  
Joint service enforcement and education/ awareness raising resources can then be focused
on these hotspots during planned exercises. 
8.3.2 The hotspot locations on all land in the borough will be reviewed and monitored every six
months to check whether the locations are still affected by dog control issues. Resources can
then be reallocated to new hotspots were necessary.
8.3.3 Islington Council has access to a network of fixed and mobile (close circuit television units)
CCTV units across the borough. The enforcement of serious dog control issues may use
CCTV to provide evidence, especially for persistent offenders. Any use of evidence from this
source will be in compliance with the requirements under the Regulation of Investigative
Powers Act 2000. 
8.3.4 The use of CCTV will be in conjunction with officer intelligence and will be part of a joined up
approach amongst all officers with enforcement powers and the CCTV control teams, to
ensure a coordinated efficient and proportionate enforcement operation.

8.4.0 Awareness Raising & Education Campaigns
8.4.1 As part of a unified approach publicity and communications regarding dog control will involve
all relevant council departments and partners. Plans will be jointly developed to outline how
the council and other agencies will publicise and promote responsible dog ownership and
discourage dog fouling and anti social behaviour.
8.4.2 We will use a variety of cost effective ways to increase awareness:
♦ Use of network of well trained existing officers to provide up to date and accurate
information.
♦ Clear and accessible poster and leaflet campaigns.
♦ Relevant press & media releases
♦ Clear reporting options for officers and residents
♦ Specific dog events 
♦ Work with local schools and youth groups
♦ Work with relevant charities and interest groups
♦ Work with national organisations 
♦ Promotion at council or community events
♦ Distribution of dog bags through retail outlets 

♦ Articles in “in house” newsletters and website (e.g. Council newsletters, HFI
newsletters, etc)
♦ Develop and maintain a dedicated webpage on dog control and responsible dog ownership


8.5.0 Monitoring and Review
8.5.1 This strategy’s aim and effectiveness will be reported on using a number of evaluation tools.  This evaluation will highlight the successes of the strategy and also illustrate any gaps in the
performance of the awareness raising and or enforcement functions.  These performance
indicators are listed below: 


♦ Evaluation of authorised officer training and understanding
♦ Number of leaflets distributed = number of messages
♦ Review number of participants at dog awareness events 
♦ Review number of fixed penalty notices issued 
♦ Review number of fixed penalty notices paid/cancelled
♦ Review number of prosecutions
♦ Increase in public satisfaction (residents survey) 

♦ Review of dog control complaints statistics particularly dog fouling
♦ Reduction of dog fouling hotspots in the borough
♦ Monitoring of authorised officer performance/customer care


8.5.2 This strategy is a working document and will be updated as necessary. Representatives of the
authorised officers will meet at least twice per year to evaluate the performance indicators above
with a view to updating this document and our working practices accordingly. We will seek to invite
other related agencies to these meetings.
8.5.3 Our reviews will also seek to introduce where necessary any new related powers granted to local authorities in managing local environmental quality.  The outcomes for progress on this strategy will be linked to Islington’s local environmental quality survey results which tell us periodically how clean our street environment is and will help us reset annual priority areas.


9 COMPLAINTS

9.0.1 The council wants to provide residents with high quality services and so complaints are
treated very seriously. If anyone is unhappy about a particular service, any action taken or
want to make a suggestion, they should first talk to the relevant local office or staff in that
department. Contact Islington on 020 7527 2000 can provide assistance with the number of
the relevant service area and re-direct the call. 
9.0.2 The relevant service area will be advised of the complaint and follow Islington Council
complaints procedures to deal with complaints and send a full written reply within 10 working
days. 
9.0.3 Details of our full complaints procedure, can be found on our website: -
http://www.islington.gov.uk/complaints

9.1.0 OPENESS AND HELPFULNESS

9.1.1 We aim to be open about the work we do and will be available to provide general advice, deal
with specific cases and investigate complaints.  We view formal enforcement as a last resort
and prefer to work with the community to achieve compliance.  We will provide translation and
interpretation services if English is not spoken or written by anyone we deal with.
9.1.2 For further information on these, and any other council services, please call Contact Islington
who will have telephone translation support available and information on how to obtain or read
this document in Braille or large print. Contact Islington can also be reached on 020 7527
2000 or email contact@islington.gov.uk or visit http://www.islington.gov.uk/accessibility 
9.1.3 This is a public document.  Further copies of this above can be obtained from: 
          Street Environment Services
          Environment and Regeneration Department
          1 Cottage Road N7 8TP
          Telephone 020 7527 2000 
          Fax 020 7527 4755
This document can also be found on our website - http://www.islington.gov.uk/dogs. 
9.1.4 This document is reviewed periodically and we would be pleased to receive any comments
you have on it. Please send your comments in writing to the address shown above. 
9.1.5 This policy was endorsed and agreed by the Executive Committee on 17th January 2008
9.1.6 This policy was last updated on 24th April 2009


Thursday 12 November 2009

The bottom line part 2... must come out



Diaorrhea in Dogs: Causes and Treatment

 

Diaorrhea is the passage of loose, unformed stools. In most cases there is a large volume of stool and an increased number of bowel movements. The two most common causes of diaorrhea in dogs are dietary indiscretion and intestinal parasites. Many canine infectious diseases are also associated with acute diaorrhea.

Food takes about eight hours to pass through the small intestines. During that time, the bulk of the food and 80 percent of the water is absorbed. The colon concentrates the remainder. At the end, a well-formed stool is evacuated. A normal stool contains no mucus, blood, or undigested food.

With rapid transit through the bowel, food arrives at the rectum in a liquid state, resulting in a loose, unformed bowel movement. This type of rapid transit accounts for the majority of temporary diaorrhea in dogs.

Dietary indiscretion is a common cause of rapid transit. Dogs are natural scavengers and tend to eat many indigestible substances, including garbage and decayed food, dead animals, grass, wild and ornamental plants, and pieces of plastic, wood, paper, and other foreign materials. Many of these are irritating to the stomach as well as to the bowel, and are partially eliminated through vomiting.

Food intolerance can also cause rapid transit. Foods that some dogs seem unable to tolerate can include beef, pork, chicken, horsemeat, fish, eggs, spices, corn, wheat, soy, gravies, salts, spices, fats, and some commercial dog foods. Note that food intolerance is not the same as food allergy, which causes dermatitis and possibly vomiting, but rarely causes diaorrhea.

Intestinal parasites are a common cause of acute and chronic diaorrhea in puppies and adults. The greatest problems are caused by roundworms, hookworms, whipworms, threadworms, and giardia.

Diaorrhea is a common side effect of many drugs and medications, particularly the NSAIDs,which include aspirin. Some heart medications, some dewormers, and most antibiotics also can cause diaorrhea.


Dogs can experience diaorrhea when they’re excited or upset-for example, when they’re going to the veterinary hospital or a dog show. In fact, any sudden change in a dog’s diet or living circumstances may cause emotional diaorrhea.

 
Home Treatment of Diaorrhea 

The most important step in treating acute diaorrhea is to rest the GI tract by withholding all food for 24 hours. The dog should be encouraged to drink as much water as he wants. With persistent diaorrhea, consider giving a supplemental electrolyte solution such as Pedialyte, available over the counter in pharmacies and grocery stores. Dilute it by one-half with water and add it to the dog’s drinking bowl. Custom canine electrolyte solutions and sport drinks are also available, such as K9 Thirst Quencher. These are flavored to encourage the dog to drink. If the dog won’t drink the electrolyte solution, offer only water. A low-salt bouillon cube dissolved in the water can help encourage him to drink.

Acute diaorrhea usually responds within 24 hours to intestinal rest. Start the dog out on an easily digestible diet that’s low in fat. Examples are boiled chicken with the skin removed. Cooked white rice, cottage cheese, cooked plain pasta and soft-boiled eggs are other easily digestible foods. Feed three or four very small meals a day for the first two days. Then slowly switch the diet back to the dog’s regular food.

Obtain immediate veterinary care if:

  • The diaorrhea is consistent and continues for more than 48 hours
  • The stool contains blood or is black and tarry
  • The diaorrhea is accompanied by vomiting
  • The dog appears weak or depressed or has a fever
Chronic Diaorrhea
The first step is to find and treat the underlying cause. Diaorrhea resulting from a change in diet can be corrected by switching back to the old diet and then making step-by-step changes to pinpoint the cause. When lactase deficiency is suspected, eliminate milk and dairy products from the diet, particularly as they are not required for adult dogs.
 

Diaorrhea caused by overeating (characterized by large, bulky, unformed stools) can be controlled by tailoring the diet more accurately to the caloric needs of the dog and feeding his daily ration in three equal meals.
 

Chronic, intermittent diaorrhea that persists for more than three weeks requires veterinary attention.

With thanks to webMD